<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Ethical Audit: 1. Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/</link>
	<description>Raising Bernard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I did the household audit thing, and it came out really well, except for transport. But then, it didn&#039;t seem able to cope with the entire &quot;commuting by train&quot; thing either, so &lt;em&gt;shrug&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All told our household worked out to be about 7.5-8 tonnes, most of which was transport (due to two cars, and now living in the back-end of nowhere).  Not bad - considering we&#039;re on oil central heating (which I always understood to be one step off burning tyres to keep warm), I thought we&#039;d be much worse than we are.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the household audit thing, and it came out really well, except for transport. But then, it didn&#8217;t seem able to cope with the entire &#8220;commuting by train&#8221; thing either, so <em>shrug</em></p>

<p>All told our household worked out to be about 7.5-8 tonnes, most of which was transport (due to two cars, and now living in the back-end of nowhere).  Not bad &#8211; considering we&#8217;re on oil central heating (which I always understood to be one step off burning tyres to keep warm), I thought we&#8217;d be much worse than we are.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, I did the individual option; I should have mentioned that. I&#039;m not sure how they would differ, because it asked lots of questions about my household.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I did the individual option; I should have mentioned that. I&#8217;m not sure how they would differ, because it asked lots of questions about my household.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rr</title>
		<link>http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>rr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. I did the &quot;household&quot; option and got a result of 7.25 tonnes per year which I was of course thinking required me to be slung instantly into the outer darkness being on the way to double your result... but then I compared to the national average and that turns out to be 10.22 tonnes per year. So I&#039;m confused. Feeling slightly smug, but confused.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I did the &#8220;household&#8221; option and got a result of 7.25 tonnes per year which I was of course thinking required me to be slung instantly into the outer darkness being on the way to double your result&#8230; but then I compared to the national average and that turns out to be 10.22 tonnes per year. So I&#8217;m confused. Feeling slightly smug, but confused.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rr</title>
		<link>http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>rr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uborka.nu/rise/2007/09/an-ethical-audit-1-introduction/#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hahahahahahaha.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Superb. &quot;A life-striped bear&quot;. I sense a book deal in the offing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m going to take the bloody emission test thingy, ok? Does it include methane and other greenhouse gases? I have two small but efficient producers of biogas which might push up my index.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahahahaha.</p>

<p>Superb. &#8220;A life-striped bear&#8221;. I sense a book deal in the offing.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m going to take the bloody emission test thingy, ok? Does it include methane and other greenhouse gases? I have two small but efficient producers of biogas which might push up my index.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
